KNOWLEDGE

Academy

Start your discovery and get a fresh perspective on...
Reporting under CSRD starts this year—here’s what that means

The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) came into force across Europe in January 2023. Globally, countries are introducing their own frameworks, with momentum building toward greater alignment across sectors, markets, and reporting standards. But it’s 2025 when the real pressure begins.

This is the first year that thousands of large companies across the EU are expected to report under the new framework, using data from 2024. For sustainability leaders, that shifts the conversation from planning to proof. It’s no longer about whether your organisation is preparing. It’s whether your portfolio is ready.

CSRD demands more than ambition. It requires clarity, structure, and verifiable insight into how your assets actually perform. And that means energy efficiency, emissions, and operational transparency are now headline issues—not backend metrics.

What UK companies need to know

Even though the UK is no longer part of the EU, the CSRD could still apply. If your company has securities listed on an EU-regulated market, or if it generates more than €150 million in EU turnover, you may fall within scope. This includes UK firms with large EU subsidiaries or branches that generate significant revenue. It’s critical to review your structure now. Reporting obligations will expand, and compliance won’t just mean better paperwork—it means disclosing meaningful, auditable sustainability data across your operations.

Early CSRD reporters are flagging around 24 material topics and 40 key impacts, risks and opportunities on average—but there’s no consistent way they’re doing it. The takeaway? If your team isn’t aligned on how to approach double materiality, you’re going to struggle to report clearly or credibly.

Not just data—disclosure with direction

CSRD doesn’t just ask for more data. It requires meaningful and auditable reporting on how your operations align with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) expectations. This includes specific disclosures on energy use, carbon emissions, climate risk, and the resilience of assets across your portfolio.

This level of transparency means moving beyond estimates and modelled projections, toward real-world performance indicators that stand up to external scrutiny. Friends of EFRAG notes that while Scope 1 and 2 emissions are widely reported with clear targets, Scope 3 remains a significant challenge, especially across supply chains. Many companies set net-zero targets without clear pathways to reach them, making performance tracking and transparency non-negotiable.

The organisations that will thrive under this directive are those who already know how their buildings perform—and who can clearly show what’s improving, what’s not, and what comes next.

The role of building performance in CSRD

Buildings are one of the biggest contributors to operational emissions. That makes them a focal point in CSRD reporting, whether you manage a portfolio of offices, retail, logistics, or mixed-use assets.

But the real challenge isn’t the emissions themselves. It’s knowing where they come from, what’s driving them, and how to bring them down—credibly, not theoretically.

That’s where operational insight becomes essential. You don’t need hundreds of sensors or new systems to get started. Often, the first indicators are already available. What’s missing is a clear line of sight between performance, targets, and action. 

Don’t wait for compliance to catch you

CSRD is being phased in, but the reputational pressure is already here. Investors, regulators, and occupiers are all looking for clear evidence of environmental performance. And with carbon reporting under greater scrutiny, gaps in visibility won’t just delay compliance—they’ll erode confidence.

It’s not about racing to comply. It’s about using CSRD as a structure to validate what you already know: where performance is strong, where the friction points are, and how to prioritise action that actually delivers impact. Readiness isn’t about ticking boxes. It’s about knowing where you stand.

You don’t need to have all the answers. But you do need to be clear on how your portfolio performs today, and what needs to happen next.

New EU Energy Directive: what it means for commercial real estate

In April 2024, the European Parliament adopted a major update to the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD)—and it’s now officially in force. While the direction of travel has been clear for some time, this revision puts regulatory weight behind it. For the first time, minimum performance standards for non-residential buildings are legally binding across the EU: class F by 2030, class E by 2033.

But the most significant shift isn’t just the targets. It’s the infrastructure being built around them—data registers, renovation passports, and full lifecycle visibility. The EU isn’t just asking for efficiency. It’s mandating transparency.

This is about more than compliance

The directive marks a clear move toward transparency. Alongside updated energy thresholds, it introduces renovation passports, national building registers, and more robust operational reporting. These additions point to a future where performance is no longer privately managed or loosely defined. The data will be centralised, comparable, and public.

What this means for commercial real estate is simple: if you don’t have a clear, verified understanding of how your assets perform, you’re at risk. Once performance data enters the public domain, any gap between what you report and what’s actually happening on the ground becomes a reputational and financial liability.

What about the UK?

While the UK is no longer bound by EU law, the direction of travel is similar. The UK’s Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES) already ban new leases on commercial properties rated below EPC band E, and by 2030, all leased non-domestic buildings are expected to reach band B. That’s a sharper target than the EU’s class E. And with future updates to the UK’s Energy Performance of Buildings framework under review, pressure is only building. For UK organisations with EU assets—or those eyeing investment or partnerships across Europe—alignment with EPBD-style transparency isn’t optional. It's a signal that the UK market, too, is shifting from ad-hoc compliance to systemic accountability.

Decisions need to be rooted in real data

Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) offer only part of the picture. Without real-time visibility, strategic decisions around retrofits, asset use, and financial planning remain reactive. The longer that visibility gap remains, the harder it becomes to respond to tightening regulation with confidence.

Those ahead of the curve aren’t waiting. They’re building internal clarity now—using operational data to validate performance, identify inefficiencies, and prioritise actions that deliver measurable impact. That clarity allows for faster, better-informed decisions that protect long-term value and resilience.

We believe action starts with clarity. You can’t improve what you can’t see—and that’s where many sustainability plans stall. We help leaders identify waste, track performance in real time, and unlock the insights that drive down risk before it shows up in your compliance report.


Grid capacity is becoming a hidden blocker to net-zero

Across Europe, organisations are pressing ahead with electrification. Gas boilers are being replaced with heat pumps. Retrofit plans are being drawn up. Net-zero strategies are moving forward.

But too often, these projects run into a critical barrier: the grid can’t supply the energy needed to power them.

Heat pumps don’t fail—until they do

The issue comes down to load. Heat pumps require a significant amount of electricity. When they're sized to match the output of a gas boiler, without first reducing total demand, they often exceed the site's available grid connection.

That triggers a cascade of problems: delays while waiting for extra capacity, costly upgrades to the connection. Or no upgrade at all—because the capacity simply isn’t available.

What should have been a significant decarbonisation step becomes a bottleneck. The system is in. But it can’t be turned on.

It’s not an edge case—it’s happening everywhere

In the UK, more than £200 billion in energy projects are currently stuck in grid connection queues (National Grid ESO, 2023). In the Netherlands, grid operators are pausing new connections in areas of high demand. Capacity is capped, and electrification is outrunning infrastructure.

The result? Heat pumps sit idle. Buildings go unheated. Projects stall—not because the ambition was wrong, but because the strategy skipped a step.

What’s going wrong—and how to fix it

The core problem isn’t the heat pump. It’s the assumption that you can plug it in and carry on as before. That approach ignores the one factor you can control: demand. It’s like switching to an electric car but never checking how far the battery can go. You keep driving the same way and then wonder why you’re stuck on the side of the road.

When you optimise performance first, by fixing controls, tuning systems, and reducing waste, you lower the baseline energy use. That means you can install a smaller heat pump. One that might work within the power you already have. One that doesn’t trigger delays, redesigns, or overspend.

Start with the building, not the tech

Sustainability isn’t about what you install. It’s about what you stop wasting.

That’s why insight is essential. You need to know what’s running, what’s using energy without delivering value, and where efficiency can be gained now, not once the project is already in motion.

Your infrastructure has limits—budget, space, and now power. The best projects don’t ignore those limits. They design around them. If electrification is the goal, efficiency is the enabler, and the strongest net-zero strategies are the ones that can actually be delivered.

EU Flags major gaps in Ireland’s 2030 climate strategy

In May 2025, the European Commission delivered a stark assessment of Ireland’s National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP), highlighting a significant shortfall in the country's projected emissions reductions. The NECP anticipates a 25.4% reduction by 2030, falling well below the legally binding target of 42% under the EU's effort-sharing regulation.

The Commission's critique extends beyond the emissions gap, pointing to a lack of clarity on funding mechanisms for the necessary €119–€125 billion investment outlined in the plan. This absence of a detailed financing strategy raises concerns about the feasibility of achieving the proposed climate objectives.

This evaluation signals potential regulatory tightening and increased scrutiny. Properties with poor energy performance may face increased pressure to undergo efficiency upgrades, which can impact asset valuations and investment decisions.

Implications for commercial real estate

The European Commission’s latest assessment is a reminder of how quickly expectations are shifting. Climate strategies that once felt ambitious are now considered baseline. And across commercial real estate, there’s growing pressure—not just to set goals, but to show progress.

In this environment, understanding how assets perform becomes more than a reporting exercise. It’s the foundation for resilience, credibility, and future value. Aligning with regulatory targets is part of the picture. But increasingly, it's the ability to demonstrate efficiency and impact that sets portfolios apart.

That starts with visibility. The clearer you are on how your portfolio operates today, the more confidently you can navigate what’s next.

ISO 14060 set to become key standard for net-zero strategies

ISO 14060 is set to become a key standard for businesses committed to achieving net-zero. Building on the 2022 net-zero guidelines will provide a clear framework for setting and delivering credible (science-based) targets. As scrutiny on corporate climate commitments grows, this standard will help organisations move beyond vague pledges and offsetting, ensuring real, measurable progress on decarbonisation. For sustainability leaders, it offers a structured approach to strengthening their organisation’s net-zero strategy and demonstrating accountability.


With ISO 14060 expected ahead of COP30 in November 2025, now is the time to start preparing. Organisations that align early—by reviewing targets, testing implementation strategies, and integrating the standard into new frameworks—will be well-positioned when it comes into effect.


European Commission to revise Corporate Sustainability ReportingDirective

The European Commission is revising the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), aiming to simplify requirements and reduce the burden on businesses. Under the proposed changes, only companies with more than 1,000 employees and either over €50 million in net turnover or €25 million in assets will need to comply. This adjustment is expected to exempt around 80% of previously affected businesses, significantly narrowing the scope of mandatory sustainability reporting.


For organisations, this shift presents both challenges and opportunities. While it may ease administrative pressure for many, it also raises concerns about maintaining transparency and accountability in corporate sustainability efforts. Businesses that remain within the reporting scope will need to focus on delivering high-quality disclosures that align with evolving stakeholder expectations. With the proposal awaiting final approval, now is the time for organisations to assess how these changes will impact their sustainability strategies and long-term ESG commitments.

Key takeaways from the 17th Annual CSR & ESG Summit 2025

The 17th Annual Global CSR & ESG Summit 2025 in Hong Kong brought together industry leaders to discuss the evolving role of sustainability in business. With a focus on climate action, transition finance, carbon emissions, and diversity, the event highlighted how companies can integrate ESG principles into long-term strategy and decision-making.


A key theme was the growing pressure on businesses to move beyond compliance and demonstrate measurable impact. Speakers emphasised the need for transparent reporting, scalable green finance solutions, and innovative approaches to reducing emissions. As regulations tighten and investor expectations rise, the summit reinforced the message that ESG is no longer optional—it’s a critical factor in building resilient, future-ready businesses.

Nature study discovers data drift and its impact on AI performance

Recent research published in Nature highlights how AI models trained on unreliable or unverified data can produce inaccurate predictions, undermining their effectiveness. While this study focuses on medical imaging, the issue of data drift—the gradual decline in AI performance due to poor-quality data—applies just as much to energy management.


AI might have a place in enhancing energy monitoring and optimisation. Still, if AI models rely on flawed, outdated, or AI-generated data, errors can accumulate - leading to miscalculations in energy usage patterns, inefficient resource allocation, or even increased consumption. For AI to truly support sustainable energy outcomes, businesses must ensure their energy data is reliable, validated, and traceable. Without this foundation, AI remains a powerful assistant but not a decision-maker when it comes to managing energy in the built environment.