Back to

Knowledge Academy

finance

Energy price volatility is now a financial risk

Energy prices don’t just fluctuate anymore, they move in ways that are hard to predict and even harder to plan for. Energy price volatility is now a financial risk.

For a long time, energy was treated as a cost you could manage, negotiate a contract, improve efficiency, and move on. That only works when prices are relatively stable.

That stability is gone.

The market has changed

Across Europe, energy prices now shift quickly, driven by supply issues, geopolitical tension, and the growing reliance on renewables that depend on weather conditions.

There are still calmer periods, but they sit within a wider pattern of disruption. Prices can rise sharply, then drop again, often without much warning. Electricity prices in the EU increased more than fourfold in a short period and remain vulnerable to geopolitical shocks, even after stabilising.

This is not a temporary phase, it is how the market behaves now.

Why this hits financial performance

When prices move like this, energy stops being a predictable cost. It starts affecting forecasts, margins, and investment decisions. What looked manageable at the start of the year can shift quickly, making budgets unreliable and long-term planning harder.

Energy is no longer just something operations deal with, it directly affects financial outcomes. The focus is usually on market prices, but the bigger issue is often internal.

Many organisations don’t have a clear view of how energy is actually used. Demand patterns are unclear, inefficiencies are hidden, and cost drivers are not well understood.

That makes it difficult to respond when prices change, because there is no solid baseline to work from.

Why this is becoming a board-level issue

This is where the shift happens. Energy volatility now affects financial planning, risk management, and overall performance, which means it can’t sit in the background anymore.

It needs to be understood at leadership level, in the same way as any other financial risk. You can’t control the market. But you can control how exposed you are to it.

That starts with understanding how energy behaves inside your organisation, not just what you pay for it, but what is driving it. Without that, you are reacting. With it, you can plan.

Volatility is not going away. The real risk is not being able to deal with it.

Energy has moved from a commodity cost to a critical resource that needs to be managed, understood, and accounted for, just like any other financial driver.

Managing energy like finance is no longer optional

Most organisations manage their finances with discipline. They track performance, understand trends, question anomalies, and make decisions based on clear data.

Energy is rarely treated the same way.

It is still seen as a cost to reduce, rather than something to manage properly. That gap is where risk starts to build.

Energy lacks the structure finance depends on

Finance is structured. There are clear baselines, regular reporting, and a shared understanding of what good looks like. Energy is often the opposite.

Data is fragmented, reporting is inconsistent, and performance is not always clear. Decisions get made based on partial information, or not made at all.

What financial discipline looks like in energy

When energy is managed like finance, a few things change. There is a clear view of how demand behaves over time, not just total consumption, but patterns, peaks, and variation. Performance is tracked consistently, so changes can be explained, not guessed.

There is also accountability. When something shifts, it is noticed. When performance drops, it is understood. When improvements are made, they are validated.

That level of control is standard in finance. It is still rare in energy.

Why this matters now

Energy has become less predictable and more expensive, but the bigger issue is uncertainty. If you cannot explain what is driving energy use, you cannot forecast it. If you cannot forecast it, you cannot manage financial exposure.

This is why energy is moving into financial conversations, because it behaves like a financial variable.

Many organisations invest in upgrades or new systems, expecting improvement to follow. But without proper tracking, there is no clear link between action and outcome.

Costs may change, but the reason is unclear. Savings are assumed, but not proven. Risk remains, even if it is less visible.

From cost reduction to financial control

Managing energy like finance is not about cutting costs. It is about understanding what is happening, why it is happening, and what needs to change. That requires consistent data, clear baselines, and the ability to track performance over time.

It also requires energy to be part of decision-making at a higher level, not just something handled in the background.

Energy is becoming part of financial planning, risk management, and reporting. Organisations that treat it that way gain clarity and control. They can respond to change, justify decisions, and reduce uncertainty.

Those that do not, remain reactive, dealing with the impact rather than managing it. The question is not whether energy should be managed like finance. It already behaves that way. The question is whether it is being treated that way inside the organisation.

Energy risk moves onto the balance sheet

At the 2026 Dublin Real Estate Outlook event, James Byrne and Catherine Duggan will address a shift that is becoming difficult to ignore. Energy risk is no longer operational. It is financial.

Poor visibility on energy performance is already affecting asset value, forecasting, and investment decisions. When energy is not properly accounted for, risk remains hidden. When plans are based on incomplete insight, exposure increases.

“Organisations would never make financial decisions without proper accounts. Yet that is still how many energy decisions are made.”

The implication is straightforward. Energy needs to be managed with the same discipline as finance. That requires structured insight, clear accountability, and a way to test decisions before capital is committed.

For more information, go to: https://www.bisnow.com/events/dublin/state-of-market/dublin-real-estate-outlook-2026-10445

The risk no one’s managing: why energy risk management is now a business priority

Every well-run organisation understands the importance of risk management. Identifying, avoiding, and mitigating risk is second nature in finance, operations, and governance. Yet when it comes to energy, that discipline often disappears.

For decades, energy was treated as a relatively stable cost and a guaranteed resource. Prices rarely moved enough to matter, and supply was assumed to be secure. So few organisations built the same level of systems or scrutiny around energy that they did around financial or operational risk.

That complacency is now becoming a liability. Who’s managing the risk connected to the energy that keeps your operations going?

A new landscape of risk

Energy risk today looks nothing like it did a generation ago. The shift from fossil fuels to electrification has created new dependencies — and new vulnerabilities.

Oil and gas once offered security of supply. Now, as demand for low-carbon electricity accelerates, networks are struggling to keep up. Utilities are imposing caps on the amount of power they can guarantee, and access to electricity — once taken for granted — is no longer guaranteed.

It’s easy to say, “Let’s use energy more efficiently.” But that’s impossible without the right structures, frameworks, and insight into how energy is actually used. Without accurate data or reliable reporting, efficiency slips quietly. Equipment drifts from design performance. Processes waste energy unseen. What starts small becomes costly — unnecessary spending, wasted capacity, and growing exposure to energy volatility.

And that brings us back to the real issue: risk. When supply is limited, waste isn’t just inefficient. It’s unsustainable.

Managing energy as a core business risk

Energy can no longer be excluded from the risk framework. Understanding where it comes from, how it’s used, and how it might be managed is fundamental to operational continuity.

And managing energy starts with visibility. Reliable data systems, clear forecasting, and regular reporting are the foundation of control. When organisations treat energy with the same rigour as finance — structured systems, auditable data, and forward-looking planning — they not only reduce waste but build resilience.

Because if something is essential to keeping your business running, it deserves to be managed like every other critical risk.

Back to

Knowledge Academy

finance

Why energy risk now sits on the CFO’s desk

Access to capital now depends on clarity.

Banks, investors, insurers, and regulators are no longer waiting for organisations to act voluntarily on sustainability. They’re setting the terms. If a company can’t show credible, verifiable data on its carbon and energy performance, its ability to borrow, insure, or attract investment will start to tighten.

That responsibility now lands with the CFO. Frameworks like the IFRS sustainability standards are reshaping how business value and risk are measured, and energy data sits right at the centre. The quality of that data will decide whether a sustainability report holds weight — and whether a company can prove it's managing risk responsibly.

The missing link in financial governance

Most finance leaders assume their organisations already have reliable data. But in reality, energy and associated carbon information is often scattered, incomplete, or unverifiable. It sits in different systems, owned by different teams, and is rarely audited. That gap leaves sustainability disclosures exposed and puts credibility on the line.

Finance teams are used to basing every decision on solid evidence. Forecasts, budgets, and cash flow all rely on structured, traceable data. Energy performance should be no different.

Without the same discipline as shown to the financial aspects of the business, decarbonisation plans are just educated guesses.

From compliance to control

Financial planning and decarbonisation are connected. Every spending decision affects both cost and carbon. Managing that balance takes the same structure and accountability that finance already applies to reporting and risk.

Energy data needs to be treated like financial data: it must be consistent, auditable, and ready for scrutiny. Achieving that means linking finance, operations, and sustainability around shared standards and integrated systems.

Technology helps close the gap. Real-time monitoring, scenario planning and reporting tools can turn energy performance into something measurable and dependable — a financial metric that informs investment decisions, supports compliance, and protects access to capital.

Clarity as a measure of value

Energy risk is financial risk. Treating it that way builds resilience and trust, both with regulators and with the market. Clear and reliable energy data is no longer a nice-to-have; it is a must-have.

Clarity now defines credibility. And credibility decides access to capital.

What does comfort and air quality actually cost you?

Things as simple as simultaneously heating and cooling adjacent spaces leads to waste - and reduced comfort. Only one in five buildings has a control system regulating heating, cooling, ventilation and hot water generation. And still most of these buildings operate at a Class C energy efficiency level. The ones without control systems are worse again, operating at efficiency grades of E, F or G.