Back to

Knowledge Academy

news

Energy risk moves onto the balance sheet

At the 2026 Dublin Real Estate Outlook event, James Byrne and Catherine Duggan will address a shift that is becoming difficult to ignore. Energy risk is no longer operational. It is financial.

Poor visibility on energy performance is already affecting asset value, forecasting, and investment decisions. When energy is not properly accounted for, risk remains hidden. When plans are based on incomplete insight, exposure increases.

“Organisations would never make financial decisions without proper accounts. Yet that is still how many energy decisions are made.”

The implication is straightforward. Energy needs to be managed with the same discipline as finance. That requires structured insight, clear accountability, and a way to test decisions before capital is committed.

For more information, go to: https://www.bisnow.com/events/dublin/state-of-market/dublin-real-estate-outlook-2026-10445

Why real efficiency starts with demand, not supply

Most organisations still focus on supply: how much energy comes in, what renewables are added, or which generation technologies are installed. Yet few truly understand how much energy is really needed. Without knowing how energy is used or how much is being wasted, there’s no foundation for real efficiency or credible progress.

The unseen half of performance

It starts small. Someone’s too cold, so facilities tweak a setting. Someone else feels a draft, so a louvre gets adjusted. Then a floor is reconfigured, and suddenly comfort complaints are cropping up far too often. The system drifts from its original setup. Energy use climbs, comfort falls, and no one knows why.

If you don’t have good data on how systems are performing, you can’t tell what’s efficient and what’s being wasted. It’s like managing a manufacturing business, buying raw materials without understanding how much material is actually needed to manufacture your products, and without any idea of the impact that waste has on the cost of producing these products.

Designing for the past

This lack of insight doesn’t just cause day-to-day waste. It also affects long-term decisions. When it’s time to replace equipment, new systems are often sized using old data. Many are 50 to 100 percent too big, and when they’re replaced “like for like,” that waste is built in for years to come.

The result is easy to see — higher costs, lower performance, and missed opportunities to improve.

Turning demand into intelligence

Efficiency starts with understanding demand. When you know how energy is used and where it’s wasted, you can make better choices. You can tune systems, target upgrades, and invest based on facts instead of assumptions.

Real progress doesn’t come from adding more supply. It begins with recognising what’s already happening — and using that insight to maintain control.

How the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive is reshaping reporting

The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) came into force across Europe in January 2023. Globally, countries are introducing their own frameworks, with momentum building toward greater alignment across sectors, markets, and reporting standards. But it’s 2025 when the real pressure begins.

This is the first year that thousands of large companies across the EU are expected to report under the new framework, using data from 2024. For sustainability leaders, that shifts the conversation from planning to proof. It’s no longer about whether your organisation is preparing. It’s whether your portfolio is ready.

CSRD demands more than ambition. It requires clarity, structure, and verifiable insight into how your assets actually perform. And that means energy efficiency, emissions, and operational transparency are now headline issues—not backend metrics.

What UK companies need to know

Even though the UK is no longer part of the EU, the CSRD could still apply. If your company has securities listed on an EU-regulated market, or if it generates more than €150 million in EU turnover, you may fall within scope. This includes UK firms with large EU subsidiaries or branches that generate significant revenue. It’s critical to review your structure now. Reporting obligations will expand, and compliance won’t just mean better paperwork—it means disclosing meaningful, auditable sustainability data across your operations.

Early CSRD reporters are flagging around 24 material topics and 40 key impacts, risks and opportunities on average—but there’s no consistent way they’re doing it. The takeaway? If your team isn’t aligned on how to approach double materiality, you’re going to struggle to report clearly or credibly.

Not just data—disclosure with direction

CSRD doesn’t just ask for more data. It requires meaningful and auditable reporting on how your operations align with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) expectations. This includes specific disclosures on energy use, carbon emissions, climate risk, and the resilience of assets across your portfolio.

This level of transparency means moving beyond estimates and modelled projections, toward real-world performance indicators that stand up to external scrutiny. Friends of EFRAG notes that while Scope 1 and 2 emissions are widely reported with clear targets, Scope 3 remains a significant challenge, especially across supply chains. Many companies set net-zero targets without clear pathways to reach them, making performance tracking and transparency non-negotiable.

The organisations that will thrive under this directive are those who already know how their buildings perform—and who can clearly show what’s improving, what’s not, and what comes next.

The role of building performance in CSRD

Buildings are one of the biggest contributors to operational emissions. That makes them a focal point in CSRD reporting, whether you manage a portfolio of offices, retail, logistics, or mixed-use assets.

But the real challenge isn’t the emissions themselves. It’s knowing where they come from, what’s driving them, and how to bring them down—credibly, not theoretically.

That’s where operational insight becomes essential. You don’t need hundreds of sensors or new systems to get started. Often, the first indicators are already available. What’s missing is a clear line of sight between performance, targets, and action.

Don’t wait for compliance to catch you

CSRD is being phased in, but the reputational pressure is already here. Investors, regulators, and occupiers are all looking for clear evidence of environmental performance. And with carbon reporting under greater scrutiny, gaps in visibility won’t just delay compliance—they’ll erode confidence.

It’s not about racing to comply. It’s about using CSRD as a structure to validate what you already know: where performance is strong, where the friction points are, and how to prioritise action that actually delivers impact. Readiness isn’t about ticking boxes. It’s about knowing where you stand.

You don’t need to have all the answers. But you do need to be clear on how your portfolio performs today, and what needs to happen next.

Why decarbonisation strategy fails without energy insight

A recent Masterclass with OPNBuildings, HaysMac and Crystal Associates explored why many sustainability strategies fall short. The discussion highlighted a consistent pattern: leaders focus on carbon targets without understanding the energy systems that need to support them. Because when energy is ignored, every decarbonisation plan stands on weak foundations.

Why decarbonisation efforts fail

Many organisations treat carbon as the outcome. This creates the false impression that carbon reduction is the primary goal. Carbon is only a measure: sustainability depends on understanding how energy is used and where it is lost. Companies often assume unlimited capacity or rely on offsets rather than improving performance. This widens the credibility gap around net-zero commitments.

Decarbonisation fails when energy is not measured, tracked, or managed accurately. Leaders struggle to predict future demand. And this only makes sense: working with spreadsheets and fragmented information, it’s easy to overlook inefficiencies. Without the right insights, it’s easy to miss early signs that systems are not performing as expected. This leads to ambitious plans built on uncertain ground. Money is wasted. Capacity is strained. Strategy becomes noise rather than impact.

Treat energy as a necessary input

A stronger approach begins with treating energy as a critical input. Organisations need clear scenario planning: the ability to map goals, constraints, and baselines in one place. A structured way to review progress and adapt.

The message is clear. Stop wasting energy. Build sustainability on real insight and real performance. Understand demand, capacity, and efficiency. Only then can sustainability plans become credible, deliverable, and financially sound.

Back to

Knowledge Academy

news

The risk no one’s managing: why energy risk management is now a business priority

Every well-run organisation understands the importance of risk management. Identifying, avoiding, and mitigating risk is second nature in finance, operations, and governance. Yet when it comes to energy, that discipline often disappears.

For decades, energy was treated as a relatively stable cost and a guaranteed resource. Prices rarely moved enough to matter, and supply was assumed to be secure. So few organisations built the same level of systems or scrutiny around energy that they did around financial or operational risk.

That complacency is now becoming a liability. Who’s managing the risk connected to the energy that keeps your operations going?

A new landscape of risk

Energy risk today looks nothing like it did a generation ago. The shift from fossil fuels to electrification has created new dependencies — and new vulnerabilities.

Oil and gas once offered security of supply. Now, as demand for low-carbon electricity accelerates, networks are struggling to keep up. Utilities are imposing caps on the amount of power they can guarantee, and access to electricity — once taken for granted — is no longer guaranteed.

It’s easy to say, “Let’s use energy more efficiently.” But that’s impossible without the right structures, frameworks, and insight into how energy is actually used. Without accurate data or reliable reporting, efficiency slips quietly. Equipment drifts from design performance. Processes waste energy unseen. What starts small becomes costly — unnecessary spending, wasted capacity, and growing exposure to energy volatility.

And that brings us back to the real issue: risk. When supply is limited, waste isn’t just inefficient. It’s unsustainable.

Managing energy as a core business risk

Energy can no longer be excluded from the risk framework. Understanding where it comes from, how it’s used, and how it might be managed is fundamental to operational continuity.

And managing energy starts with visibility. Reliable data systems, clear forecasting, and regular reporting are the foundation of control. When organisations treat energy with the same rigour as finance — structured systems, auditable data, and forward-looking planning — they not only reduce waste but build resilience.

Because if something is essential to keeping your business running, it deserves to be managed like every other critical risk.

Why energy risk now sits on the CFO’s desk

Access to capital now depends on clarity.

Banks, investors, insurers, and regulators are no longer waiting for organisations to act voluntarily on sustainability. They’re setting the terms. If a company can’t show credible, verifiable data on its carbon and energy performance, its ability to borrow, insure, or attract investment will start to tighten.

That responsibility now lands with the CFO. Frameworks like the IFRS sustainability standards are reshaping how business value and risk are measured, and energy data sits right at the centre. The quality of that data will decide whether a sustainability report holds weight — and whether a company can prove it's managing risk responsibly.

The missing link in financial governance

Most finance leaders assume their organisations already have reliable data. But in reality, energy and associated carbon information is often scattered, incomplete, or unverifiable. It sits in different systems, owned by different teams, and is rarely audited. That gap leaves sustainability disclosures exposed and puts credibility on the line.

Finance teams are used to basing every decision on solid evidence. Forecasts, budgets, and cash flow all rely on structured, traceable data. Energy performance should be no different.

Without the same discipline as shown to the financial aspects of the business, decarbonisation plans are just educated guesses.

From compliance to control

Financial planning and decarbonisation are connected. Every spending decision affects both cost and carbon. Managing that balance takes the same structure and accountability that finance already applies to reporting and risk.

Energy data needs to be treated like financial data: it must be consistent, auditable, and ready for scrutiny. Achieving that means linking finance, operations, and sustainability around shared standards and integrated systems.

Technology helps close the gap. Real-time monitoring, scenario planning and reporting tools can turn energy performance into something measurable and dependable — a financial metric that informs investment decisions, supports compliance, and protects access to capital.

Clarity as a measure of value

Energy risk is financial risk. Treating it that way builds resilience and trust, both with regulators and with the market. Clear and reliable energy data is no longer a nice-to-have; it is a must-have.

Clarity now defines credibility. And credibility decides access to capital.